Hamamatsu
R5900-01-L16 Photomultiplier Tube
Spectral /
Spatial Characterization
Robert S. Light
Center Of Imaging Science
Rochester Institute of Technology
06/1/00
Introduction:
In the field of radiometry the need
for accurately calibrated detectors cannot be stressed enough. Only through
highly calibrated instruments can there be highly accurate information. In
lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) applications the use of a photomultiplier
tube (PMT) as a detector is desired because of its fast rise time, linearity,
and extremely low signal induced noise. However, an attribute that must be
corrected in order to obtain precise variations in the detected signal is spatial
uniformity.
The spatial uniformity of the PMT is described as the
variation of sensitivity across the effective area of the photocathode. In
developing a lidar system the effects of spatial non-uniformity can be best
eliminated by characterizing the spatial properties of the PMT then devising a
way to reduce the effects and then calibrate out the rest.
The use of the Hamamatsu R5900U-01-L16 PMT as a lidar
detector will be considered. Mainly a spatial uniformity and spectral response
characterization will be performed. The PMT to be characterized consists of a
multi-anode 16 channel linear array. Each channel contains a spectral filter,
which results in spectral dependence of the output.
Background:
The photomultiplier tube is a very
sensitive radiant energy detector within the 200-900 nm range of the
electromagnetic spectrum. The principle of PMT light detection is illustrated
in fig(1). Incident light is absorbed by the photocathode that in turn emits
electrons, referred to as photoelectrons. Electrons are directed by an electric
field to a dynode. For each incident electron a number of secondary electrons
are emitted. The secondary electrons are then directed toward a 2nd
dynode and so on. Ultimately an anode collects the electrons and provides the
signal current, which can be measured.
Fig.
(1)

The typical gain of a PMT is on the order of 10^6.
This high gain eliminates the need for amplifiers and the applied voltage
controls its range of gain providing flexibility in operation. The rise time of
a typical PMT is in the vicinity of 1 to 2 nanoseconds, depending on the load
resistance. The cathode dark current of a PMT is affected considerably by
temperature where its sensitivity and gain change very little with temperature
fluxations. Dark current at room temperature are on the order of 10 ^-15
amperes at the photocathode and double about every 10 degrees Celsius.
At low light levels the signal to
noise ratio will limit detection and measurement. A way of describing the limit
to detection is the Noise Equivalent Power (NEP), which is the power into the
devise, which invokes a signal equivalent to the noise. A typical PMT NEP
rating at 1hz bandwidth of 400nm illumination is 7*10^-16 watts. The stability
of a PMT is less than satisfactory. Although when operated at low anode
currents stability is improved, best accomplished by adjusting the supply
voltage to best suit the detection situations.
Experimental Methods:
Light Source Characterization:
Determining the characteristics of
the light source that will be used in the calibration of any light detector is
crucial in order to obtain reliable results. The important characteristics of
the light source used to characterize the Hamamatsu PMT will be spectral
radiant intensity at the image plane for each step of the monochrometer over
the range of 300-800nm, and light spot diameter at the image plane.
Figure (2) illustrates the optical
path. Below is a listing of the optical components.
Fig.
(2)

1: 32 Volt, 210 Watt GE Tungsten Bulb
2: Ground Glass
3: Neutral Density Filter
4: Monochrometer
5: Pinhole
6: Aperture
7: Cemented Doublet Lens
8: 50:50 Beamsplitter
9: CCD Camera
10:
CCD/Radiometer/Photomultiplier Tube
The optical path begins with a
tungsten source emitting a Planck color temperature of about 2000 K. The light
is first scattered by ground glass to produce a fairly even solid angle of
flux. Since the optical detector under inspection will be a highly sensitive
photomultiplier tube a neutral density filter is placed in the optical path to
reduce the incident light upon the photocathode. Preliminary image plane
irradiance measurements will be taken with a radiometer without a N.D. filter
in place in order to characterize the source. The light flux is then attenuated
by the monochrometer resulting in a narrow bandwidth of light. The flux leaves
the monochrometer through an exit slit then passes through a pinhole, which
will provide the “image” of a spot. Next an aperture is put in place to cut out
any stray light that may make it to the lens and blur the image. The lens used
will be a cemented doublet, which shall provide accurate chromatic focusing
within a very shallow depth of focus. Element 8 is a beamsplitter that will be
discussed shortly, for now the light flux transmits through the beamsplitter
and focuses to a point in space.
The beamsplitter and 2 CCD video
cameras are used in finding the focal plane of the setup. First I use a CCD
camera without a lens in position 10 of figure (2) and adjust its location
until a crisp image of the spot is viewed on the video monitor. I then use the
second CCD camera in position 9 and focus upon the CCD chip of the first
camera. I now know that the CCD camera in position 9 is focused in the image
plane of the optics setup. I can now remove the camers at position10 and
precisely place another element into the image plane by adjusting it’s location
until it is focued through the CCD camera in position 9.
Determination of Spectral Radiant
Intensity at Image Plane:
In determining the radiant intensity
at the image plane a highly sensitive radiometer (ASD) was used to measure the
light. I allowed the bulb to warm up while dissipating 210.87 watts and allowed
the sensor of the ASD to cool for 60 minutes to improve stability. The fiber
optic bundle was placed into the image plane by the method described above then
I scanned the optic bundle across the imaged light spot until a high signal to
noise ratio was received from the radiometer. The spot illuminated 3 of the 19
fibers within the bundle that collect light in the visible region. After
collecting spectra from 380nm to 860nm in 1nm increments post processing was
necessary to adjust the signal units from:
to:
. First to multiply out the steradians unit I must determined
the solid angle subtended from a field of view of 20 degrees. This relationship
is shown in equation (1).
Eq.
(1) ![]()
Where
is one half of the
field of view. Next the spectrum was multiplied by a factor of
to account for the
spot illuminating only 3 of the 19 fibers that collect visible light. Then the
spectrum can be corrected for the true area of illumination by multiplying by
the area of the spot. Figure (3)
illustrates a spectra after processing.
Fig.
(3)

Determination of Spectral Throughput of Photocathode Filter:
One of the unique features of the
Hamamatsu R5900U-L16 PMT is that it has 16 separate photocathodes. A different
spectral filter precedes each photocathode so that the 16 signals obtained from
a read out correspond to irradiance from a band of the spectrum. It would be of
importance to determine the spectral transmittance of each filter so that
processing of the output signals lends more information. In the case of
oceanographic lidar applications, multi-spectral imaging is important due
characteristic emission spectra of the water’s constituents.
To determine the spectral
transmission of each filter, certain characteristics of the system shall be
considered. In understanding the signal received from the PMT’s anode one must
consider the illuminating energy source, the throughput of the optical path,
the properties of any filter preceding the photocathode, the photocathode radiant
sensitivity, along with the gain of the PMT. In most situations the energy
source or illumination onto the PMT is unknown; hence the use of the devise to
measure it. In this case if all other parts of the system is known the ‘inverse
problem’ can be solved to determine the characteristics of the incident energy.
Equation (2) is a mathematical expression relating the incident radiant
intensity,
, the spectral transmission of the filter,
, the photocathode radiant sensitivity,
, and the gain,
, to the output signal,
.
Eq.
(2) ![]()
![]()
In this problem a ‘dc’ signal is
obtained. If the spectral properties of the light source were to vary we would
expect the signal, s, to vary, even if
the overall radiant intensity remained constant. This would result from the
characteristics of the filter and the photocathode; the gain itself remains
constant and can be divided out for simplicity. If we were to vary the spectral
properties of the light across the detectable range of the filter/photocathode
and measure the signal from each step of
we would have a group
of signals correlated with the wavelength of light used to obtain those
readings. We can call this constant function,
. Equation (3) describes this relationship.
Eq.
(3) ![]()
Where
describes a
convolution.
To restate our objective, we are
looking to find the spectral transmission of the filter,
. We can perform Fourier analysis in order to deconvolve the
effects of the light source upon the system. But first to simplify the
expression lets combine some terms.
Eq.
(4) ![]()
This
gives us:
Eq.
(5) ![]()
After
Fourier analysis and the application of the filter theorem:
Eq.
(6) ![]()
Again
is unknown, so we must use the expression of Equation (6) and
multiply each side by the inverse of
to isolate
.
Eq.
(7)
therefore ![]()
To
continue we must perform Fourier synthesis to the return to the space domain.
Eq.
(8) ![]()
Insert
the equality of Equation (4).
Eq.
(9) ![]()
Finally
we can solve for the spectral transmittance of the filter.
Eq.
(10) ![]()
There are some things to take into
account when solving for
. First for
to be recovered
perfectly the transfer function or as we have called it, the incident radiant
intensity,
must be known and
have nonzero magnitude everywhere.
Is known but has
finite bandwidth, thus must have zeros, therefore perfect recovery will not be
possible, although a precise estimation can be obtained. Also there must be no
uncertainty in
or
such as noise. For this application the PMT has a very high
signal to noise ratio so precise approximations are possible.
In the past analysis of the system
there has been an assumption; that the incident radiant intensity of the source
is constant across the spectrum under analysis, 400-800 nm. For the tungsten
source used in the experiment the spectral radiant intensity is not constant
and the obtained PMT signal must be adjusted to account for the non-uniformity.
To do this the radiant intensity of the source will be normalized then used to
divide the raw output PMT signal. The result will be an adjusted signal
corrected for the non-uniformity of the sources power spectrum. The following
procedure will be accurate due to the linearity of the PMT response.
Determination of Photocathode Non-uniformity:
The spatial non-uniformity of a PMT
is defined as the variation of its sensitivity across its effective area. In
order to determine the uniformity of the photocathode a spot source will be
used to illuminate a finite area of the photocathode and an output measurement
taken for that position. The source will be raster scanned across each channel
in spot diameter increments, and a measurement taken at each step. A comparison
of the outputs will lend information as to the non-uniformity of the
photocathode. In order to compare all channels, which are preceded by different
filters, some simple corrections will be applied to the outputs.
For a given channel, the source
spectrum of maximum transmission will be used to test uniformity. From this and
other information about the spectrum an expected output will be calculated, see
equation (???). The measured output will be divided by the calculated output,
which in turn will yield a metric comparable with measurements from all
channels. This signal adjustment divides out light source, filter transmission,
and radiant sensitivity characteristics leaving the variation in radiant
sensitivity as a function of position.
Continuation of Characterization:
The characterization of the
Hamamatsu R5900U-01-L16 PMT was not completed due to time constraints, although
the information contained within this report coupled with the accompanied lab
notes and knowledge of the science will supplement another’s effort in
completing the characterization.
Recommendations for continuation
would be to recalibrate the light source so that changes in the efficiency of
the bulb over time will not introduce error. If this is done light source
post-processing will be affected and will need to be reconsidered, reference to
section ‘Determination of Spectral Radiant Intensity at Image Plane’. Basically
a full understanding of the source at the image plane is needed for precision.
The ASD radiometer possesses sufficient detection characteristics to detect the
light at the image plane, again post-processing will be required to assign
units to the signal.